Drug Discovery and Development

  • Home Drug Discovery and Development
  • Drug Discovery
  • Genomics/Proteomics
  • Oncology
  • Neurological Disease
  • Infectious Disease
  • R&D 100 Awards
  • Pharma 50
    • 2022 Pharma 50
    • 2021 Pharma 50

ReGen Suing FDA Over Implant

By Drug Discovery Trends Editor | June 2, 2011

WASHINGTON (AP) – A small medical device firm whose knee implant triggered a sweeping review at the Food and Drug Administration is suing the agency for revoking approval of its device.

ReGen Biologics filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the FDA, calling the agency’s rescission of approval for its device “arbitrary and capricious.” The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

The FDA approved ReGen’s Menaflex knee repair device in 2008, despite protests by FDA scientists that it provided little, if any, benefit to patients.

When officials appointed by President Obama reviewed the decision last year, they concluded that the device should not have been cleared, saying the agency’s review was influenced by outside pressure, including lobbying by lawmakers from the company’s home state of New Jersey.

Menaflex is no longer available in the U.S. but remains on the market in Europe, where it has been used for a decade. The company’s chief executive, Gerald Bisbee, said the FDA’s action “has forced a small U.S. company, committed to improving patients’ lives, into bankruptcy.” The lawsuit argues that the FDA overstepped its authority by removing Menaflex from the market after it had already been cleared.

An FDA spokeswoman said the agency does not comment on pending legal matters.

Hackensack, N.J.-based Regen asked the FDA in 2005 to approve its device under the so-called 510k system, which allows speedy approval for devices that are similar to products already on the market.

ReGen argued that the Menaflex was comparable to shoulder joint implants sold by Johnson & Johnson, Stryker Corp. and other companies. FDA scientists rejected that argument again and again over several years, saying the device should go through a more rigorous approval pathway that requires patient testing.

The head of FDA’s device division at the time overruled those scientists in late 2008 and cleared the device. The agency said last year the decision was incorrect and that Menaflex is “technologically dissimilar from devices already on the market.”

Date: June 1, 2011
Source: Associated Press


Filed Under: Drug Discovery

 

Related Articles Read More >

Pharmacovigilance
A new era of pharmacovigilance: Worldwide master key for drug safety monitoring
Takeda Pharmaceutical in the Drug Discovery & Development Pharma 50
Takeda’s Takhzyro fares well in pediatric hereditary angioedema study
Novartis in the Pharma 50
Novartis to cut up to 8,000 positions
Gilead Sciences in the Drug Discovery & Development Pharma 50
Gilead resubmits application to FDA for twice-yearly HIV drug lenacapavir

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.

Need Drug Discovery news in a minute?

We Deliver!
Drug Discovery & Development Enewsletters get you caught up on all the mission critical news you need. Sign up today.
Enews Signup
Drug Discovery and Development
  • MASSDEVICE
  • DEVICETALKS
  • Medical Design & Outsourcing
  • MEDICAL TUBING + EXTRUSION
  • MEDTECH 100
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Subscribe to our Free E-Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • R&D World
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Drug Discovery & Development

  • Home Drug Discovery and Development
  • Drug Discovery
  • Genomics/Proteomics
  • Oncology
  • Neurological Disease
  • Infectious Disease
  • R&D 100 Awards
  • Pharma 50
    • 2022 Pharma 50
    • 2021 Pharma 50