Drug Discovery and Development

  • Home Drug Discovery and Development
  • Drug Discovery
  • Women in Pharma and Biotech
  • Oncology
  • Neurological Disease
  • Infectious Disease
  • Resources
    • Video features
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
  • Pharma 50
    • 2025 Pharma 50
    • 2024 Pharma 50
    • 2023 Pharma 50
    • 2022 Pharma 50
    • 2021 Pharma 50
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE

Pfizer and BioNTech’s updated bivalent booster retains protection against new omicron sublineages

By Brian Buntz | November 18, 2022

bivalent COVID-19 vaccine

[Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons]

Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) and BioNTech (Nasdaq:BNTX) have announced that their omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent booster fared well against novel omicron variants in neutralizing antibody detection tests.

The company published the results from the bivalent booster tests against the BA.4.6, BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1 and XBB.1 subvariants on the preprint server BioRxiv.

One month after administering a fourth vaccine dose, the geometric means of neutralization titers from the bivalent BA.4/5 vaccine was generally superior to that of the monovalent BNT162b2 booster. Overall, the Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was associated with a 3.2- to 4.8-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titers relative to the original monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. For the BA.4.6, BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1 and XBB.1 omicron variants, antibody titers were up between 4.8- to 11.1-fold from pre-booster levels.

“These data suggest the bivalent BA.4/5 vaccine is more immunogenic than the original BNT162b2 monovalent vaccine against circulating Omicron sublineages, including BQ.1.1 that is becoming prevalent globally,” the study authors concluded.

CDC recently noted that BQ.1/BQ.1.1 subvariants were currently responsible for almost half of current U.S. COVID-19 infections.

Separately, Pfizer and BioNTech announced that it was developing the BNT162b4 vaccine candidate that encodes for SARS-CoV-2 non-spike proteins that could offer a superior immune response over its spike-protein-based vaccines.

In October, a preprint from researchers at Columbia indicated that the retooled bivalent boosters might not have significantly superior performance relative to the first-generation mRNA vaccines. Roughly three to five weeks after administration of the fourth vaccine dose with a bivalent mRNA vaccine, individuals had similar neutralizing antibody titers compared with those who had a fourth dose of monovalent vaccine against a range of variants, including BA.4/BA.5.

A Harvard preprint study reached similar conclusions.

In mid-day trading, Pfizer shares were mostly flat, holding steady at $48.29. BioNTech shares were up 0.34% to $166.82.


Filed Under: Infectious Disease, Uncategorized
Tagged With: bivalent booster
 

About The Author

Brian Buntz

As the pharma and biotech editor at WTWH Media, Brian has almost two decades of experience in B2B media, with a focus on healthcare and technology. While he has long maintained a keen interest in AI, more recently Brian has made making data analysis a central focus, and is exploring tools ranging from NLP and clustering to predictive analytics.

Throughout his 18-year tenure, Brian has covered an array of life science topics, including clinical trials, medical devices, and drug discovery and development. Prior to WTWH, he held the title of content director at Informa, where he focused on topics such as connected devices, cybersecurity, AI and Industry 4.0. A dedicated decade at UBM saw Brian providing in-depth coverage of the medical device sector. Engage with Brian on LinkedIn or drop him an email at bbuntz@wtwhmedia.com.

Related Articles Read More >

Glass vial, pipette and woman scientist in laboratory for medical study, research or experiment. Test tube, dropper and professional female person with chemical liquid for pharmaceutical innovation
From 1.5% to 5.9%: Deloitte digs into what’s fueling Big Pharma’s R&D IRR climb
Recce targets A$15.8M to advance anti-infectives into Phase 3 trials
Vial of Steroid injection with a syringe on black table and stainless steel background.
The true cost of steroid-toxicity 
3D illustration of Palm painful - skeleton x-ray, medical concept.
Q&A: AnaptysBio’s CMO on rosnilimab’s ‘compelling’ phase 2b RA results
“ddd
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest news and trends happening now in the drug discovery and development industry.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
Drug Discovery and Development
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • Medtech100 Index
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Medical Design & Outsourcing
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • R&D World
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Drug Discovery & Development

  • Home Drug Discovery and Development
  • Drug Discovery
  • Women in Pharma and Biotech
  • Oncology
  • Neurological Disease
  • Infectious Disease
  • Resources
    • Video features
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
  • Pharma 50
    • 2025 Pharma 50
    • 2024 Pharma 50
    • 2023 Pharma 50
    • 2022 Pharma 50
    • 2021 Pharma 50
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE