Drug Discovery and Development

  • Home Drug Discovery and Development
  • Drug Discovery
  • Women in Pharma and Biotech
  • Oncology
  • Neurological Disease
  • Infectious Disease
  • Resources
    • Video features
    • Podcast
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Webinars
  • Pharma 50
    • 2025 Pharma 50
    • 2024 Pharma 50
    • 2023 Pharma 50
    • 2022 Pharma 50
    • 2021 Pharma 50
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE

Majority of Lung Cancer Treatment Decisions Not Guided by Genetics: Survey

By Drug Discovery Trends Editor | April 23, 2015

Despite the majority of newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients being tested for genetic mutations, a gap still exists for providing a personalized treatment plan for patients based on their cancer type and mutation subtype, according to a new international survey. About 60 percent of surveyed U.S. oncologists do not determine their treatment decisions based on EGFR mutation subtype, compared with 50 percent in Canada and 23 percent in Asia. The survey, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, was recently presented as a late-breaking abstract in the ESMO-IASLC Best Abstracts session at the 2015 European Lung Cancer Conference in Geneva, Switzerland. 
 
“It is extremely important for each person diagnosed with lung cancer to receive the most appropriate treatment based on his or her particular cancer,” said Jennifer King, Director of Science and Research for Lung Cancer Alliance. “For some patients, this will mean receiving genetic testing at the time of diagnosis to allow doctors to develop a personalized treatment plan.” 
 
The survey showed that 26 percent of U.S. physicians decided on therapy for their patients with advanced NSCLC before their mutation test results were available, compared to 30 percent in Europe and 12 percent in Asia. 
 
According to the surveyed doctors, the main reasons for not conducting genetic tests, aside from tumor histology, were insufficient tissue/uncertainty of sufficient tissue, poor performance status and test results taking too long to come back. 
 
International guidelines, which are endorsed specifically in the U.S., recommend EGFR mutation testing should be performed at diagnosis of NSCLC and results should guide treatment decisions to ensure all patients receive appropriate therapy according to their specific cancer type. According to the survey, almost two-thirds of physicians across all 10 countries chose prolonging survival as the most important treatment goal in deciding first-line therapy in advanced NSCLC. 
 
According to the survey, 77 percent of U.S. and European oncologists order EGFR mutation tests before starting first-line therapy, but Asian oncologists order tests more frequently at 92 percent. In the Asian community, lung cancer is the number one cause of cancer death. Among Asian patients diagnosed with NSCLC, approximately 50 percent have EGFR mutations compared to 10 to 15 percent of Caucasians. There are different types of EGFR mutations, the most common being exon 19 deletions (Del19) and the exon 21 (L858R) substitution.
 
“When a lung cancer diagnosis is made, it’s important to receive a biomarker test to determine whether particular mutations like EGFR are present,” said Edward Kim, M.D., with the Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System in Charlotte, NC. “EGFR mutation status is a critical prognostic factor that many doctors use when determining the most appropriate treatment options for patients. One would not start a patient with breast cancer on treatment without knowing hormone receptor or HER-2 status. We must be diligent in testing appropriate patients for mutation status to offer the appropriate therapy.”
 
Source: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc


Filed Under: Genomics/Proteomics

 

Related Articles Read More >

Columbia-CZ team develops 10.3M parameter model that outperforms 100M parameter rivals on cell type classification
Spatial biology: Transforming our understanding of cellular environments
DNA double helix transforming into bar graphs, blue and gold, crisp focus on each strand, scientific finance theme --ar 5:4 --personalize 3kebfev --v 6.1 Job ID: f40101e1-2e2f-4f40-8d57-2144add82b53
Biotech in 2025: Precision medicine, smarter investments, and more emphasis on RWD in clinical trials
DNA helix 3D illustration. Mutations under microscope. Decoding genome. Virtual modeling of chemical processes. Hi-tech in medicine
Genomics in 2025: How $500 whole genome sequencing could democratize genomic data
“ddd
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest news and trends happening now in the drug discovery and development industry.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
Drug Discovery and Development
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • Medtech100 Index
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Medical Design & Outsourcing
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • R&D World
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World

Copyright © 2026 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Drug Discovery & Development

  • Home Drug Discovery and Development
  • Drug Discovery
  • Women in Pharma and Biotech
  • Oncology
  • Neurological Disease
  • Infectious Disease
  • Resources
    • Video features
    • Podcast
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Webinars
  • Pharma 50
    • 2025 Pharma 50
    • 2024 Pharma 50
    • 2023 Pharma 50
    • 2022 Pharma 50
    • 2021 Pharma 50
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE