Drug Discovery and Development

  • Home Drug Discovery and Development
  • Drug Discovery
  • Women in Pharma and Biotech
  • Oncology
  • Neurological Disease
  • Infectious Disease
  • Resources
    • Video features
    • Podcast
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Webinars
  • Pharma 50
    • 2025 Pharma 50
    • 2024 Pharma 50
    • 2023 Pharma 50
    • 2022 Pharma 50
    • 2021 Pharma 50
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE

FDA advisory panel recommends boosters only for older and high-risk individuals

The panel, however, resoundingly rejected a plan to administer the vaccine as a booster to individuals 16 years of age and older.

By Brian Buntz | September 17, 2021

Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine

Doses of the COVID-19 vaccine at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md. DoD photo by Lisa Ferdinando.

The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) unanimously supported emergency use authorization to administer the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty vaccine as a booster to those 65 years of age and older, and individuals at high risk of developing severe COVID-19.

The panel, however, resoundingly rejected a plan to administer the vaccine as a booster to individuals 16 years of age and older. A total of 16 panelists voted ‘no’ while two others voted ‘yes.’

“With regard to the extrapolation of data from much older populations to 16- and 17-year-olds, we have no data on the safety in these populations at all that have been presented so far. And that concerns me significantly,” said Dr. Archana Chatterjee, VRBPAC member and dean of the Chicago Medical School. While supporting boosters in older populations, Chatterjee said she would “like to see more data before I would recommend it for a younger age group.”

The safety data for boosters are “inadequate,” agreed VRBPAC member Dr. Michael Kurilla, the director of NIH’s Division of Clinical Innovation. “The effectiveness data is pretty much limited to boosting antibody levels,” Kurilla said. Without more data on correlative protection, it is challenging to evaluate booster efficacy, he argued. “I also agree with the CDC that the incremental benefit to the younger population really has not been demonstrated at all,” Kurilla concluded.

Similarly, Eric Rubin, VRBPAC member and editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, said “the marginal benefit of a third dose of vaccine for people who are already vaccinated is likely to be very small for reducing the overall burden.”

Complicating matters were a series of audio glitches during multiple Pfizer presentations during the VRBPAC meeting, which, at one point, prompted an unplanned break.

President Biden had vowed to make booster doses broadly available as soon as September 20, pending regulatory backing.

In August, FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock and CDC Director Rochelle Walensky agreed to support the administration’s booster shot initiative.

The majority of experts on the panel stressed the need for more substantial safety and efficacy data before recommending authorization of the booster.

CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) could potentially clarify VRBPAC’s recommendations concerning people who face a high risk of potential occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2.


Filed Under: clinical trials, Drug Discovery, Infectious Disease
Tagged With: BioNTech, coronavirus, covid-19, COVID-19 vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine trial, COVID-19 vaccines, FDA, Pfizer, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, VRBPAC
 

About The Author

Brian Buntz

As the pharma and biotech editor at WTWH Media, Brian has almost two decades of experience in B2B media, with a focus on healthcare and technology. While he has long maintained a keen interest in AI, more recently Brian has made making data analysis a central focus, and is exploring tools ranging from NLP and clustering to predictive analytics.

Throughout his 18-year tenure, Brian has covered an array of life science topics, including clinical trials, medical devices, and drug discovery and development. Prior to WTWH, he held the title of content director at Informa, where he focused on topics such as connected devices, cybersecurity, AI and Industry 4.0. A dedicated decade at UBM saw Brian providing in-depth coverage of the medical device sector. Engage with Brian on LinkedIn or drop him an email at [email protected].

Related Articles Read More >

The FDA’s AI ambitions depend on better data practices
Researchers working in the clinical laboratory
Outpatient clinics are becoming critical Infrastructure for drug trials
SAS launches clinical trial analytics software built on its Viya cloud native analytics platform
Bayer’s Lynkuet approved by FDA for menopausal hot flashes
“ddd
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest news and trends happening now in the drug discovery and development industry.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
Drug Discovery and Development
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • Medtech100 Index
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Medical Design & Outsourcing
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • R&D World
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search Drug Discovery & Development

  • Home Drug Discovery and Development
  • Drug Discovery
  • Women in Pharma and Biotech
  • Oncology
  • Neurological Disease
  • Infectious Disease
  • Resources
    • Video features
    • Podcast
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Webinars
  • Pharma 50
    • 2025 Pharma 50
    • 2024 Pharma 50
    • 2023 Pharma 50
    • 2022 Pharma 50
    • 2021 Pharma 50
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE